Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the ninja-forms domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the powerpress domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wordpress-seo domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
controversial observations Archives - Page 10 of 14 - Out of the Ortho Box
Browsing Tag

controversial observations

Uncategorized May 16, 2012

Is Feminism Hillary, Olivia, Jamie, or the-Hasidic-Women-in-the-Photo?

Is feminism Hillary, Olivia, Jamie, or the-Hasidic-woman-in-the-photo?

Let’s see.

In recent news, we have Hillary Clinton, a well-known feminist, appearing unadorned and bespectacled in a photo while abroad in Bangladesh.  In this interesting piece on the subject, Amy Odell says:

When asked by CNN about the makeup-less photo of her in Bangladesh
making the rounds this week, Hillary confirmed that her appearance is
“just not something I think is important anymore.” Fox News aside, the
world rejoiced over that sentiment. She “does not need to fret about
having the right sort of career-enhancing wardrobe, haircut or makeup,” wrote Robin Givhan for the Daily Beast.
“She could arrive for a diplomatic meeting wearing flip-flops and blue
jeans and no one would doubt her authority.” Styleite’s Jada Wong responded simply with, “Yeah, she rules.”

Personally, I (Ruchi here) think this is awesome.  A woman should absolutely be respected for her mind, values, and personal accomplishments.  Whether my political views are aligned with Hillary’s is highly irrelevant; my inner self salutes her inner self.  If this is feminism, man, I’m a feminist.

…In December of 2010, Hillary memorably tackled the media’s fixation on her clothing choices during a talk in Kyrgyzstan, when an interviewer asked about her favorite clothing designers. She replied, “Would you ever ask a man that question?”

Her comments on CNN yesterday are sure to inspire fans who wish they,
like her, didn’t feel pressured to look a certain way, as all women are.
This line in particular stood out: “I feel so relieved to be at the
stage I’m at in my life right now.”

[Note: if she actually showed up for a diplomatic meeting wearing flip-flops and blue jeans, hmmm, I’m not such a fan.  Part of the cool is that she could – but won’t.]

Next in line we have Olivia Palermo, a well-known “socialite.”  (My guard is up.)   It seems that:  

The socialite has become one of the most influential red-carpet
celebrities for style-conscious Orthodox women, who must follow three core rules of modesty in how they dress.

Well, now.  I consider myself a style-conscious Orthodox woman, and I’ve never heard of her.   But you can’t argue that sleeves on wedding gowns and longer skirt lengths have been made cooler by the likes of Kate Middleton.

The
Duchess of Cambridge, Kate Middleton, is also praised for her ‘ladylike’
clothes, and Ms. Heyman added that celebrity stylist Rachel Zoe, who
often wears layers of vintage, ‘covers up in [a way] that works for the
Orthodox
girls.’

Are Olivia and Kate feminists, then, for wearing longer, classier clothing that don’t broadcast or objectify them?  For not buying into that whole industry?  What is their motivation for covering up and creating a new trend?

If feminism means that we cover more to be taken seriously more (both by men and women), man, I’m so in.

Thirdly, we arrive at Jamie Grumet, a 26-year-old model and blogger – I refuse to link anything here – who recently appeared on the highly controversial cover of Time magazine nursing her 3-year-old son.  In a tank top and skinny jeans, her pose and facial expression defy you to question her ways, with the accusatory headline “Are You Mom Enough?” splashed across the page.

I’ve seen Jamie hailed by feminist women, for standing up for her attachment ways.  I’ve seen her vilified by equally strong-minded women, for selling out, turning moms against each other in a man-run corporation, and branding herself by her body instead of her mind.

Is Jamie a feminist?  Was she used?  Taken advantage of?

If feminism here means the right to expose yourself publicly, I’m out.  Equal footing with men, remember?  

Finally, we have these two Hasidic women.  They don’t seem to care about modern fashion, nor do they seem impressed or even aware that their pictures are being taken.  Are they repressed?  Cool, like Hillary, and relieved, to not care?  Do they “rule” like she does?

Are they feminists, like Olivia and Kate, for dressing in a way that does not leave them objectified?

Do they have anything at all in common with Jamie, for standing out with their non-conformist ways and proudly bucking the trend?

If feminism here clashes with these women’s choice of dress and lifestyle, whoops, I’m out again.  But if it means that just as my pediatrician wears long side burns and a bow tie, and that’s just fine, well, these women are cool.   That’s a choice.  If it means they are immune to the dictates of a bunch of socialites, nay, don’t even know what they have said to build immunity to, I’m in!

Who, indeed, is a feminist?

Then there’s me.  I like to look cute.  Sometimes I feel proud of that  – I fancy that maybe I am an example that looking “good” and being Orthodox are not mutually exclusive.  Other times I feel like a mindless robot.  Who says purple is cute this year?  Why do I care?  Maybe the most liberated women are those that know that following trends is plain old stupid and are man enough (pardon the expression) to live that clarity.

On the third hand, it makes me feel good when I feel that I look good.  But who is dictating those feelings?  Any girl worth her style-salt knows that your “cute clothes” from five years no longer make you feel cute.

So who’s the feminist now?

Related posts:

Yoga, Feminism, Judaism: how do you make your decisions?
The Decision Every Woman Must Make
Mythbusters #2:  Orthodox Women are Second Class Citizens 


Uncategorized May 9, 2012

What is Israel, Anyway?

Since I shy away from controversial topics, I’ve danced around the Israel issue for a long time.  Well, that’s about to end.

It seems that Neshama Carlebach has changed the lyrics to the Israeli national anthem, Hatikva, to broaden its meaning and include Israeli Arabs.

Here are the revised words below. Changes are in bold, with the original words following in brackets.
As long as the heart within
An Israeli [Jewish] soul still yearns
And onward, towards the East
An eye still gazes towards our country [Zion]
We have still not lost our hope
our ancient [2000 year] hope
To be a free people in the land of our fathers [our land]
in the city in which David, in which David encamped [land of Zion and Jerusalem]
To be a free people in our land
In the land of Zion and Jerusalem.

Part of what stymies American Jews in trying to figure out what in tarnation is going on in Israel is the core issue of separation of church and state.  Now whether that precept is good for the Jews or bad for the Jews depends on a lot of factors, but bottom line, it’s what us US Jews are used to.

Israel, though, was founded as joint church (pardon the expression) and state.  The state IS the church, see?  It was formed as a Jewish nation.  Now we have a move to widen that definition – make it Israeli instead of Jewish.

What IS Israeli???

Falafel?  Nosy taxi drivers?  Searing heat in the southern deserts?  Drought?  War?  Teva pharmaceuticals?  Naot sandals?  Soldiers?  What?

If Israel is not Jewish, what is it?

And if it is Jewish, must it be so politically?

For reasons I cannot fully explain, this change, following the whole controversy of  Jerusalem not being listed as the capital of Israel on birth certificates, makes me so, so weary.  Sad.  Tired.  Help me understand.

What do you think?

Uncategorized April 27, 2012

Jewish v. Jew-ish, or Is It True that Orthodox People Don’t Think Reform Jews are Jewish

This is the post I didn’t want to write.

I wanted to pretend it wasn’t a problem.  Wasn’t an issue.  Wasn’t the elephant in the room.

The first time I heard this accusation I was flummoxed.  What?  Of course Reform Jews are Jewish.  Where did that even come from??  Where do people even get these things from??  How do people believe these things about us?

But I think I understand things a little better now.  And that’s good news and bad news.  This blog has helped crystallize for me what exactly the issue is.  In Judaism, there’s a teaching:

I’ve learned much from all my teachers.  But from my students most of all.

That’s how I feel about all those who read and comment on this blog.  And here’s what I’ve learned (and please hang on to the end; this is like a geometry proof.  If you hate geometry, hang on anyway; it’s like a recipe):

1. Orthodox people define Judaism very technically.  Either you’re born to a Jewish mother, or you convert according to halacha (Jewish law).

2.  However, Reform Jews (I think) define Judaism more conditionally.  If you feel Jewish, act Jewish, raise the kids Jewish, were raised Jew-ish, you’re Jewish.

3. In some cases, the Orthodox view will be more inclusive (like when a born Jew celebrates Christmas, wears a cross, burns the Israeli flag, and eats pepperoni pizza, he’s still as Jewish as Moses, according to Orthodox philosophy).

4. In some cases, the Reform view will be more inclusive (like when someone is born to a Jewish father but not a Jewish mother, he is still Jewish if he behaves Jewishly, according to Reform philosophy).

5. Therefore, since Reform Jews tie identity with behavior, they think Orthodox Jews do, too.

6. Therefore, a Reform Jew who isn’t very observant might assume that the Orthodox don’t consider him Jewish, since he figures that if he were Orthodox, he wouldn’t consider himself Jewish.

7.  This is not true, since the Orthodox tie identity to technical status only (while acknowledging that observance is very important but simply not a condition for status).

8.  That’s the good news.

9.  The bad news is that since Orthodoxy asserts that only technical status determines Jewishness, conversion can become a sticking point.

10.  However, this is highly dependent on personal circumstances and each situation is taken case-by-case.

11.  Finally, I consider issues of personal status to be extremely private and unless there’s a practical reason that someone is asking me or needs to be told for halachic (Jewish law) reasons, I don’t intervene in this area.

12.  Of all the things I deal with in Jewish education, this is by far the most sensitive and potentially hurtful: who is and isn’t a Jew?

13.  I wish I never had to hurt anyone’s feelings and that my religious beliefs and standards never had to make anyone feel bad.

14. In the vast majority of cases, they don’t.

How are you used to thinking about identity – Jewish (technical) or Jew-ish (behavior-based)?

UPDATE: May 8, 2012 – Due to the unprecedented number of comments below, you must scroll to the bottom of the page and click “load more” to view the more recent comments.

Uncategorized April 23, 2012

Israel: a Failed Marriage?

Intro: I rarely follow Israeli politics.

Now before you write me off, hear this:  when my kids start reporting intricacies and details of their disagreements, he said/she said, then I did this, then he did that, and that’s why we whatever, an intense wave of fatigue washes over me.  My eyes begin to close, my limbs become heavy, and my speech becomes slurred.  I can’t even listen.

When I hear news from Israel that there was a terrorist attack or an army debacle, I feel awful.  My eyes well up with tears, my lips begin to move in prayerful entreaties, and my heart contracts in pain.

But.

When I read analyses that read like “he said/she said… then they did this and it was in retaliation for that, but that was only because whatever…” that’s when the fatigue hits.

Imagine that Israel and the Palestinians are a couple.  A couple with kids (the Land).  And they’re married (live jointly in the same place).  And they fight.  Ooh, bitterly.  Acrimoniously.  Fatally.  And the history is so long, so bad, and so tangled, that you can’t even unravel anymore who said what and who did what first, second, and third.  And then all the relatives get involved.

I am by conscious choice NOT discussing who’s at fault.  A marriage can be a failure, whether one member is abusive or it’s a mutually disastrously damaged entity.  Of course, I privately hold a very strong opinion on the matter, but that is not the subject of this post, and I’ll probably never write that post.  What’s the point?  Some will agree, and others will hate me.  Meh.

What I am saying is, if this were a couple, and they have a mutual child (by default if not by birthright), and they came to therapy in this state of dysfunction, would YOU counsel them to stay together?  Would YOU consider them peace partners?

This couple needs a divorce.  There is NO WAY to amicably (or in any other fashion) save this relationship. 

Great, Ruchi.  Now what?  Who’s moving out?  And who’s getting the kids?

I don’t know.  And I’m grateful I don’t need to decide.  But one thing is f’shore – these two will never get along, and the children are simply being damaged in the process.

Agree?  Disagree?  Flawed analogy?

Uncategorized April 17, 2012

Profanity Insanity

1996.  Shaarei Tzedek Hospital in Jerusalem.  I’m in for baby #2 when an Israeli midwife asks me in Hebrew:

“G’veret… lama hanashim hadatiyot ainam m’kallelot k’shehaim yoldot?” 

Which means: Lady, why don’t you religious girls curse when you’re giving birth?

Which is a question you’ll only hear in a delivery room in Israel!!

But it did get my wood burning.  People curse for a variety of reasons.  For shock value.  To express frustration or anger.  Out of habit.  But there are a wide variety of words that can shock and express frustration that are not considered profane.  When pushed, tired, overwhelmed, or mad, your brain will reach for the most satisfying bad word it can find and offer it up to your mouth.  Whatever comes out of your mouth will depend on what is stocked in your brain.

If you’re not reading it, saying it, listening to it, or thinking it, it’s not in your inventory, and your brain will come up with the most satisfying word that IS there (like “idiot,” “stupid”).

The other thing is: self-control is a huge part of being religious.  Think before you eat.  Think before you act.  And yes, think before you speak.  Is it nice?  Is it true?  Is it kosher?  So even the act that seems impulsive of having your brain spontaneously reach for a nice juicy word, is often going to be deferred by that process.

There are lots of reasons why profanity is bad for your soul, and bad for the souls of your listeners.  I don’t think anyone would argue that it advances one’s spirituality.  And many people that swear sometimes find that they slip or goof in uncomfortable situations, or in front of their kids (just taught junior a great new vocab word there).

What I don’t really understand is why people curse when they’re NOT pushed, not overwhelmed, not trying to insult someone in the worst way they know how.  Just in calm, casual conversation.  What is that about?  And, if you’ve gotten used to profanity, do you just get jaded?  Like, do you find yourself reaching for even more incendiary speech when you really need to make a point?  Then what?

Thoughts?

Uncategorized April 15, 2012

Mixed Marriage

Dennis Prager.  You either love him or hate him.  Since I’m not into politics, I find his political stuff kind of boring.  But his theological and people stuff?  Fascinating.

So I’ve got him on the radio on Thursday – the Seder was the following day and I’m driving around on some final errands with Dennis on the radio.  I pull into the store I need but I can’t turn the car off because I can’t stop listening.  BTDT?

A guy called in and is telling Dennis this (subject to my memory):

Dennis, I’m a liberal Reform Jew from New Jersey [Dennis himself is sort of a Reformadox Jew and is very outspoken about his Judaism].  In college I became an evangelical Christian and I eventually met a Christian woman.  Well, her values are very conservative and she’s a Republican, and Dennis, I gotta tell you, sometimes I just feel like I’m in a mixed marriage.

He went on to describe some of their differences and how he is finding himself coming around to her way of thinking, etc.  While I’m thinking, gosh, when I hear someone say mixed marriage, the first thing I think of is Jew/Christian.  This guy did not appear to be conflicted about his religious crossover but his political crossover was a big deal.  What a leap for me to even try and understand that!

My husband was once talking to a family prior to a bris (he’s a mohel, and yes, we’ve already heard that joke).  The dad was describing his son, who had become religious.  “Rabbi,” he said, “It was so hard for our family.  I would have EVEN preferred that he become a  REPUBLICAN!”

Which was extraordinarily enlightening for us, on a few fronts.  One, how very, very awful it can feel to Jewish liberal family members when “one of theirs” becomes religious, and two, how very, very wrong it seems to Jewish liberal folks to be a Republican.  (And finally, the things people will say to Rabbis could fill a book.)  Which is worse?  I guess it depends for whom.

Is religion, then, the culture, and political ideology the religion, as Dennis asserted after the call concluded?  Would your family consider it worse if you married “out” religiously or politically?

One of the things that interest me greatly about liberal Judaism is a sort of generalized agreement that intermarriage is something to avoid as a nation.  I’m not really sure where this fits into liberal “as long as we’re good people” kind of thinking.  And in my unofficial research, I find most Jews that think intermarriage is unwise are hard-pressed to come up with a solid reason WHY.  Is this attitude, that intermarriage ought be avoided, fading with time in our post-modern world?

What do you think?

Uncategorized April 2, 2012

The Deification of the Children

My friend Adina Soclof is a parenting expert, blogger, and all-around good person.  Today I’m over at her site, parentingsimply.com, blogging about the Deification of the Children, which originally appeared on my “other blog,” jfxramblings.blogpost.com.

An interesting trend is emerging in the way some parents recognize
their children’s milestone events, that I believe is
generation-specific: Facebook birthdays posts, for instance: have you
ever seen friends post happy birthday messages to their “awesome,
accomplished, talented” kids (who are turning 5) who have “taught me so
much, inspired me” and thanking them for the “honor and privilege of
being your mom”?

Which leaves me to wonder what exactly has a five-year-old
accomplished on this earth that hasn’t been facilitated by, organized
by, paid for and dutifully recorded digitally by his parents?

Click here for the rest!