Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the ninja-forms domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the powerpress domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wordpress-seo domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
controversial observations Archives - Page 5 of 14 - Out of the Ortho Box
Browsing Tag

controversial observations

Controversial Observations, Uncategorized September 15, 2013

The Elephant in the Sanctuary

So we’re all saying the confessional, yesterday. And we self-flagellate, symbolically, mostly. And we say we did all those things. But here’s the small problem:

*I didn’t actually do all those things.*

To be sure, I did some of them. Most of them. Many repeatedly and habitually. And maybe for some of the crimes I didn’t commit, I was nevertheless negligent in ways I am unaware. (Sorry for the abstract language but I confess to God alone and in no way am giving specifics here!)

What am I to think when I beat my chest and declare “I did it” when I’m pretty sure I didn’t do it?

Well.

Maybe it means I was too unruffled when I saw others trespassing on this value.

Maybe it means I didn’t do enough to be an example in this area.

Maybe it means I’ve plateaued and have stopped striving to improve.

Maybe I’ve overlooked this value in a very subtle form.

And maybe I’m apologizing on behalf of an unknown fellow Jew simply because we are all connected and all mutually responsible.

(I like the last one best.)

Wishing all my readers a beautiful year.

Controversial Observations, Uncategorized August 21, 2013

Normal

A while back, an online friend of mine, Allison Josephs (aka Jew in the City) posted the following video, entitled “Orthodox Jewish All Stars.”  The tagline was: Are all Orthodox Jewish men rabbis? Are Orthodox Jewish women allowed to work? Find out from these Orthodox Jewish All Stars!

I loved the video.  Especially the part about Tamir Goodman, a neighbor of ours and personal friend of JFX, my organization.  But something about it niggled in the back of my head and kept rattling there.  I wasn’t sure what it was, so I ignored it and figured that it would go away.
Not.
Another blogger who always makes me think, PopChassid, wrote this little number, and as soon as I read it, bingo.  I knew.
It’s all about defining normal.
Much of the time, I, too, try to show the world that yes, I am Orthodox, but I’m still normal.  Which means I like stylish clothing and looking good.  I like to be in the know when people crack pop culture jokes.  I like to be up-to-date, respected, by the standards of the world.  <—– See that?  By the standards of the world.

In Allison’s very excellent video, which addresses a real misconception, she shows how wonderful the “all-stars” of Orthodox Judaism are.  But by whose standards are they all-stars?  By the standards of the world.  They are quintessentially normal.  No, better than normal.  They take the standards deemed “normal” – successful financially, famous, esteemed – and excel therein.
But why are we buying into those standards?  To me, a Jewish all-star is someone who excels in being Jewish.  In promoting and living Jewish values, such as kindness, Torah, humility, generosity, faith.  Granted, many of the all-stars featured are doing both – for all I know, they all are – I don’t know them all personally – but this is not exactly what they are being lauded for here.  They are lauded for their cool careers that are normal by the standards of the world.
Why am I being critical?  It’s not really my style.  
But this was a very important recognition for me to make personally.  When I think of myself as “normal” (by the standards of the world) I may fail miserably.  I have a lot of kids.  I only wear skirts and dresses.  I cover my hair.  These things aren’t particularly normal.  And that’s what I walked away from this whole tararam with – that while my lifestyle, personality, and personal practices may sometimes jive with the world’s standards of normal, and that’s all fine, I shall be equally proud where they don’t.
Now, my chin lifts with pride and gratitude when someone asks me if my youngest of seven is my fist child.  My heart soars with coolness at my somewhat counter-culture skirts.  My mind expands to recall that my covered head is an external sign of my status as a married woman.
These are things I need to remind myself of.  Because I, too, am subject to everyone else’s standard of normal.  And I wish I weren’t.
PS Update/response from Allison Josephs:
I’m not sure if you noticed me say it, but the line that sums up all the “success” is me saying:  what makes this group extraordinary is not just that they thrived professionally, it’s that they stayed true to their Jewish heritage while doing so even when it wasn’t always easy. Now that’s what I call an all star.

Controversial Observations, Uncategorized June 10, 2013

Why I’m Not A Pluralist

Pluralism:  a theory that there are more than one or more than two kinds of ultimate reality 

I wonder if Merriam Webster was a nice Jewish girl.


In a post a little while ago, Larry made an insightful comment explaining the difference between inclusivism and pluralism.  Inclusivism means I don’t think you’re right, but I will include and value you.  Pluralism means you’re right and I’m also right.  There are multiple ways to be right.

Now here’s my question.  Religious pluralism does not make any mathematical sense to me, because to me, religion is based on facts.  Either God did or didn’t write the Torah as we have it today.  Either the Torah was or wasn’t given at Sinai.  Either Moses did or didn’t perform those miracles.  If religion isn’t based on a belief in facts, then what is it based on?

Take other popular debates: vaccines either do or don’t cause autism.  Either baby carrots do or don’t have chlorine on them.  Drinking coffee either does or doesn’t make your teeth yellow.  You wouldn’t hear a pluralist say, “Well, I believe that vaccines cause autism, so that’s true for me, but if you don’t believe that, then it’s not true for you.  You’re right, and I’m right.”  That’s not a fact-based argument.

If you are an evolved religious debater, you will be thinking at this point, Ruchi.  Don’t you know that even within religious thought there is a plethora of ambiguity and pluralism?  Take Hillel and Shammai.  Weren’t they both right?  Aren’t there “shivim panim latorah,” 70 ways to interpret Torah, all of which are correct?


70 but not 71.  13 ways to interpret the Torah: not more.  Where Hillel and Shammai debated, each opinion revealed a different facet of the topic at hand, both of which might have been correct, but the halacha was always determined to be either one or the other.  Or sometimes one in private, one in public.  One in temple times, and one in diaspora.  One in ideal circumstances, one to rely upon only under duress. 


While I greatly appreciate that a non-Orthodox pluralist thinks that it is correct to drive on Shabbat and also correct not to, honestly it would make more sense to me if she thought I was wrong.

And that is why I’m not a pluralist.  



Controversial Observations, Uncategorized June 4, 2013

Christian Modesty, Jewish Modesty

My fellow blogger Kelly Youngblood, an occasional commenter here, just wrote this on Christian modesty in terms of women’s dress.  Modesty actually includes a lot more than how women dress, but that’s what we’ll focus on for today.  I’ll wait for you to read it.  Hmm, hmm.  La la la.  K, are you done?  Good.

A number of similarities and contrasts struck me while reading it.

First, one of the main things Kelly laments about Christianity is “there is a broad range of what modesty may mean, and so the admonition to ‘be modest’ is generally unhelpful.”  Of course I found this interesting, since Judaism is VERY specific (to the dismay of many) about what modesty means.  Specifically, collarbones, elbows, knees, and everything in between, ought to be covered.  Nothing that is tight and form-fitting, or screaming for attention.

Next, she mentions that “modesty often tends to be about being covered up, but if that were the
case, then we should just all walk around in bathrobes.  I can’t think
of anything more covered up than that.”  I have learned in Judaism that women were created with the desire to look beautiful, and that this is a natural and honorable aspect of being a woman.  We should and must feel pretty, without being provocative.  So, clear one – no bathrobes.  Modesty is not just about covering up, it’s about allowing our inner loveliness and refinement to emerge without distractions.

She also discusses that “women are often told to dress modestly in order that they don’t cause
their Christian brothers to sin by causing them to lust after the
women.  Men are not warned in the same way…”  Interestingly, in Judaism women are warned more, although men certainly are as well, about HOW they look; but men are warned more, although women are as well, about WHAT they look at, and how they look at things.  In other words, men are cautioned more about objectifying women, and women are cautioned more not to allow themselves to be objectified.  In no way does this remove blame from the other gender – both are warned.  Of course, men could be objectified and women could objectify – but typically it goes the other way.

Finally, Kelly brings up the valid ideas that envy/objectification exists everywhere, so really, can you ever stop or avoid it?  The answer to that is that each person has to work on his own arena of fault.  If you tend to objectify people or be envious of what they show to the world, get a grip.  Could it ALSO be their fault, for flaunting?  Yup – that’s their arena of fault, not yours.

Thanks, Kelly, for getting me thinking about all these things.

Uncategorized May 28, 2013

Unlit Candles

Last night I had a nightmare.

It was Friday afternoon and my Shabbos candles were all prepared.  But I was busy doing other things and lost track of time.  I finally, panic-stricken, looked at my watch and noticed that it was 7:38 pm.  I asked my friend Rivki Silver, “What time is shkia (sundown)??”  But she just looked at me sorrowfully and shook her head from side to side.  I then saw that her candles were lit, understood that it was already Shabbos, and realized that my hands were still busy with non-Shabbos activity.
I started to cry, gazing at the pathetic sight of my unlit and forgotten candles, overwhelmed with loss, grief, and regret.  I could never redo this moment.  Never.  I woke up, still making crying sounds, flooded with relief that, indeed, it was only a dream.

Uncategorized May 12, 2013

Wimp

WIMP
By nature, I am a pacifist. What this means
is that I would do almost anything to make sure that people get along. 
Especially people who wouldn’t normally get along, such as people with
different ideologies, backgrounds, religious beliefs, or just people
who wouldn’t normally have the opportunity to actually sit down to get
to know one another on a deeper, more personal level.  That’s pretty
much what this blog is all about, and it jives with a lot of other
activities in my life.
But this is not always a good
thing. As with any character trait, even a good one, it can be taken too
far to the extreme or applied wrongly.
Sometimes I’ve
been notably quiet about certain issues. I’m not going to enumerate what
those issues are, because it is not the point of this post to
discuss those issues.  The point is to explore what to do when certain
issues seem undiscussable. When discussion will only lead to more
fighting. And when there doesn’t seem to be any way of bridging the gap,
yet the truth must be stood up for despite all wishes for peace.

Sometimes
when I see someone standing up for something that I believe in, I
inwardly cringe.  Not because he or she is wrong for standing up for the
truth. Not at all. But it’s not something that I would do, because it’s
not within my personality to stand up and take a stance publicly and
make a fuss and create conflict and controversy.  Even where (maybe) I
should.
I’m not always proud of this, because I don’t necessarily
know that this stems from the good character traits of desiring peace.
It’s very possible that people who engage in civil disobedience or
social antagonism are also big advocates of peace. Maybe it just means
that I’m a wimp.
So should I wrinkle my nose or admire those that aren’t wimps? 
TRUTH AGAINST PEACE
“Why
can’t we all just get along?” Peace is a big, big deal. But all of
us have truths that we’re willing to fight for, that we feel we’d be
amoral if we didn’t fight for. Problem is, those truths differ for each
of us. 
And
the bigger problem is, when you see red, because someone has an opinion
that strikes you as bad, wrong, inflammatory, stupid, too extreme,
offensive, childish, or condescending, you are truly unlikely to see it
that way.  
Ever
watch two people argue, where you don’t feel passionate about the
argument either way?  It’s a fascinating study, whether in person or
online, watching people disagree, get mad, misunderstand each other,
talk around each other, engage in irrelevant ad hominem attacks, and get
insulted.  Because really, both parties are doing the exact same thing:
standing up for what they believe is true, believing that getting along
is less important than The Issue.  
What
do you feel passionately about?  So passionately that you’re willing to
alienate others over?  So passionately that you’re willing to sacrifice
peace for (presuming peace is important to you)?  So passionately that
you’re willing to stick your neck out and take a major hit for?  Chances
are, the person you’re arguing with is doing the exact same thing. 
Feeling so passionately that he’s willing to do all of that.  You may be so right, and he may be so wrong, but he sees it in exactly the reverse way.
When
I put content out on this blog like some of my earliest posts, where I
described why I, as an Orthodox woman, do certain things, like wear
skirts, don’t shake hands with men, cover my hair… things that are
counter-cultural, my intent and expectation was never to have people
read it and say, “Wow, how cool!  I think I’ll cover my hair and stop
shaking hands with men.”  I mean, if someone did, great, because I think
those are good things to do (apparently).  But my expectation and hope
in these and in other counter-cultural issues-which-must-not-be-named
are thus:  that people may read them and say:
Wow. 
How interesting.  I never knew there was a solid reason for those
things.  I don’t think I will ever do them, and I still think it rather
odd, and maybe even I disagree vehemently now and always will on this
issue, but at least now I understand that people who do them have a
solid reason and that based on the things they believe, are acting in a
perfectly logical way.  And in fact, I can now see how MY opinions may
be perceived, easily, by others as being wrong, illogical, immature,
condescending, short-sighted and stupid. 

Because
this is how I, the peacenik, try to reconcile my personal inner
struggle of truth v. peace.  Guess what, people who have positions and
opinions that are exceedingly contrary to my beliefs?  I understand that
based on what you believe you are acting in a way that is so logical to
you.  I get that.  I really do.  Can you do the same for me?
Instead
mostly folks just keep getting stuck at first base, which is, let me
convince you that what you believe is wrong.  Is that working, guys?

CONCLUSION
So
I end back where I started.  Why am I a wimp on the big, scary issues? 
Because  most of the time I am flat out scared of getting clobbered. 
Having unpopular views is creepy enough in real life without inviting
the online world to mock and hate me.  How I wish, peacenik that I am,
that others could extend that curious,
I’d-love-to-hear-about-your-life-even-if-I-disagree attitude, or even
that I’m-not-interested-in-your-life-so-I’ll-read-something-else
attitude.  If so, even the toughest issues could be discussed, and truth
and peace could once again coexist… as I truly believe they were
intended to.
To my readers: thank you for mostly being that kind of crowd.  It’s truly refreshing.
Uncategorized April 22, 2013

Jew Me Down

When I learned of Senator Dennis Johnson’s slur while debating a bill, I noticed something weird.

Most of my Orthodox friends were not as shocked or outraged as my non-Orthodox friends.

At first I wondered if Senator Johnson were perhaps unaware of the meaning of the slur.  For example, I used the term “gypped” until recently, having been totally clueless that this term is a pejorative against Gypsies (Roma).  I was likewise unaware, until recently, that “midget” is derogatory while “dwarf” is preferred, and that the Deaf community prefers Deaf with a capital “d.”

But when I watched the Senator’s weak apology, this explanation seemed unlikely.

So why am I not shocked or outraged?  Mostly, because I am very “out” about my Judaism and am therefore totally aware, and even expect, to some extent, anti-semitism.  I remember my grandparents telling me how some of their best Hungarian and Polish neighbors turned on them with a vengeance during the Holocaust.  In taking a long view of Jewish history, this is the norm rather than the exception.

Do I think that Senator Johnson hates Jews?  Nah.  But neither do I fool myself into thinking that we’re well-liked out there in the world.  Yes, even in America, and yes, even today.  I would term it begrudging acceptance, for the most part.  And I am aware that in the heterodox community, this is not a very popular view.  Hence the shock and outrage anew each time a politician or celebrity slips in public with an anti-Jewish slur.

There’s a value to the shock and outrage, though.  I think it draws us together as a people and reminds us that we are different.  As you know, I think this a good thing.

In this world, there are some philo-semites and there are some anti-semites.  The difference arises in your view of which category most of the world falls into.  

What do you think?